A Bipartisan Housing Bill, The Housing For The 21st Century Act, has advanced out of committee ~

The legislation would establish federal best-practice guidelines for zoning and land use and create pre-approved “pattern books” to speed up construction.

How will this benefit the Eco Village Co-op?

I have gathered comprehensive information about the Housing for the 21st Century Act and its implications for the Eco Village Co-op. Let me now create the final analysis.

The Housing for the 21st Century Act presents a transformative opportunity for the Eco Village Co-op's development in Rapid River Township, Kalkaska County. This bipartisan legislation, which advanced out of the House Financial Services Committee with overwhelming support (50-1 vote) on December 17, 2025, establishes a federal framework that directly addresses the regulatory, financial, and technical barriers currently facing the cooperative's fourplex cohousing development model[1][2].

Legislative Overview and Momentum

The Housing for the 21st Century Act represents a rare moment of bipartisan consensus on housing policy, co-sponsored by House Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill (R-AR), Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D-CA), and Representatives Mike Flood (R-NE) and Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO)[1][3]. With committee approval secured, the legislation is positioned for full House consideration in January 2026. The bill mirrors many provisions from the Senate's ROAD to Housing Act, which already passed the Senate, creating strong prospects for eventual enactment through conference committee negotiations[2][4].

National housing organizations across the political spectrum have endorsed the legislation, including the National Association of Realtors, U.S. Conference of Mayors, National Low Income Housing Coalition, and National Association of Counties[1][2][5][6]. This broad coalition reflects recognition that America's housing crisis—with a shortage estimated at between 1.5 and 4 million units—requires comprehensive federal action that balances local flexibility with national best practices [1][4].

Federal Zoning Best Practices: Legitimizing Missing Middle Housing

Section 101: Voluntary Guidelines for Local Zoning Reform

Section 101 directs HUD to publish voluntary guidelines and best practices that states and localities may reference when modernizing their zoning frameworks [7][8]. This provision is particularly significant for rural townships such as Rapid River, where zoning codes often date to mid-20th-century patterns that exclusively favor single-family detached housing on large lots.

The federal guidelines will specifically address missing middle housing types—including duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and accessory dwelling units—precisely the housing forms the Eco Village Co-op seeks to develop[4][7][9][10]. By establishing federal-level recognition that fourplexes represent legitimate, desirable housing that should be accommodated in residential zoning districts, the legislation provides political cover and technical guidance for local officials who may face resistance from residents concerned about neighborhood character[11][12].

The voluntary nature of these guidelines aligns with American federalist principles while creating what planning scholars call "cooperative federalism"—the federal government establishes models and incentives while preserving local decision-making authority [4][13]. For Rapid River Township's Planning and Zoning Department, these HUD guidelines will offer ready-made language, dimensional standards, and precedents that can be incorporated into a Planned Unit Development ordinance or zoning overlay specifically designed to accommodate the Eco Village Co-op[14][15].

Research from Michigan and other states demonstrates that local officials often seek to approve innovative housing but lack model ordinances and are concerned about legal challenges [16][17]. Federal best practices provide both technical templates that reduce staff time and political legitimacy that help officials defend decisions to skeptical residents [4][18].

Pattern Books: Accelerating Approvals and Reducing Costs

Section 102: Pre-Approved Design Grants

Section 102 authorizes HUD to award competitive grants to eligible entities—including local governments, nonprofit organizations, and tribal governments—to establish "pattern books" of pre-reviewed housing designs[7][8][19][20]. These pre-approved designs would be code-compliant by default, allowing builders to bypass lengthy design review processes and move directly to permitting[11][21][22].

This provision creates direct synergy with Michigan's existing Pattern Book Homes initiative, launched in 2022 by the Michigan Municipal League and the Michigan Economic Development Corporation [22][23][24]. Michigan's program already offers free construction plans for duplexes and fourplexes designed to integrate into existing neighborhood fabric, with cost estimates of $500,000 per duplex and $900,000 per fourplex[23]. The federal legislation would provide grant funding to expand these efforts, potentially supporting:

Infrastructure for Eco Village Co-op Applications:

1. Grant Eligibility: As a nonprofit cooperative housing organization, the Eco Village Co-op could partner with Rapid River Township, Kalkaska County, or regional planning agencies to apply for pattern book grants[19][25][26]. Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA), which administers federal housing programs for non-entitlement communities such as Rapid River Township, could serve as the grant applicant, with Eco Village Co-op as the implementing partner [27][28][29].

2. Customized Cohousing Designs: Grant funds could support development of pattern book designs specifically for cohousing fourplexes—architectural plans that incorporate the shared common spaces, energy-efficient systems, and community-oriented design features central to the Eco Village Co-op model[14]. Pre-approval of these designs at the federal level through HUD's pattern book program would establish them as presumptively acceptable under local zoning [20][21].

3. Permitting Timeline Reduction: National data shows jurisdictions using pre-approved plans reduce permitting timelines by one month or more, with some achieving approval in under two weeks compared to traditional 3-6 month processes[21]. For the Eco Village Co-op, this acceleration could mean breaking ground in summer 2026 rather than 2027, avoiding a full year of carrying costs on land and reducing exposure to construction cost inflation.

4. Cost Savings: Builders using pre-approved plans report per-unit savings of $10,000 or more from reduced architectural fees, faster approvals, and eliminated uncertainty[21]. For a fourplex development, this represents $40,000+ in direct cost reduction—savings that translate to lower member buy-ins or increased affordability.

Michigan municipalities that are already participating in pattern book initiatives—including Kalamazoo, Ecorse, and communities across the state—have demonstrated the model's effectiveness [21][22]. Kalamazoo permitted 48 new homes under pre-approved plans by early 2024, with approval times dropping from months to under two weeks [21].

HOME Investment Partnerships Program: Expanded Funding for Cooperative Housing

Section 201: Transformative HOME Program Reforms

Section 201 modernizes the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, the largest federal block grant for affordable housing, in ways that directly benefit cooperative housing developments like Eco Village Co-op[30][7][31].

Workforce Housing Eligibility Expansion

The most significant reform expands HOME eligibility beyond low-income households (typically 50-80% of Area Median Income) to include workforce-income households earning up to approximately 120% of AMI[30][7][32][19]. This aligns precisely with cooperative housing models that serve middle-income working families—teachers, nurses, tradespeople, and small business owners—who earn too much to qualify for traditional affordable housing programs but struggle to afford market-rate housing in high-cost areas [33].

For Eco Village Co-op members, this means potential access to HOME funding for:

· Land acquisition costs

· Infrastructure development (roads, utilities, community facilities)

· Construction financing at below-market rates

· Pre-development costs, including feasibility studies and architectural planning

Cooperative housing organizations are explicitly recognized as eligible recipients under HOME program regulations[34][25]. Historical precedent demonstrates successful cooperative housing developments funded through HOME, particularly those organized as limited-equity cooperatives that maintain long-term affordability restrictions[35][36].

Infrastructure Funding for Non-CDBG Recipients

Section 201 allows HOME grantees that do not receive separate Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement funds to use HOME dollars for housing-adjacent infrastructure[30][7][19]. Rapid River Township, as a non-entitlement community (population under 50,000), does not receive direct CDBG allocations[28][29]. This provision therefore creates new eligibility for HOME funds to support:

· Road extensions or improvements to provide access to the Eco Village Co-op site

· Water and sewer line extensions or on-site wastewater treatment systems

· Electrical grid connections and broadband infrastructure

· Stormwater management systems

· Pedestrian pathways and bicycle facilities connecting to nearby communities

Traditionally, small rural communities have struggled to finance infrastructure for new housing because HOME funds couldn't cover these costs unless the community also received CDBG grants—a Catch-22 that prevented many rural infill projects [37][38]. The legislation eliminates this barrier [19][30].

NEPA Environmental Review Exemptions

Section 201 exempts small-scale infill and rehabilitation projects from National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental impact reviews, a requirement that frequently delays modest construction projects by 6-18 months[30][7][19][39]. For rural fourplex developments on previously disturbed land—precisely what Eco Village Co-op envisions—this exemption could eliminate a major approval bottleneck.

NEPA reviews for federally funded housing projects have become increasingly burdensome, requiring the assessment of alternatives, public comment periods, and extensive documentation, even for projects with minimal environmental impact [40][39]. Recent reforms in California and proposed federal changes recognize that infill development in already developed areas should receive streamlined review because environmental impacts are negligible relative to greenfield suburban sprawl [39][41].

The legislation reclassifies certain housing activities as NEPA "categorical exclusions" or "exempt activities," allowing them to proceed without complete environmental assessments[7][8][40]. This includes:

· Acquisition, construction, and rehabilitation of residential buildings on infill sites

· Tenant-based rental assistance and supportive services

· Public facilities serving residential neighborhoods

For Eco Village Co-op, this means that HOME-funded aspects of the development could proceed on an accelerated timeline, with simplified environmental documentation focused on site-specific issues (contamination, wetlands, historic preservation) rather than requiring comprehensive ecological impact statements [40].

Extended Commitment Timelines

Section 201 extends the timeframe for jurisdictions to commit HOME funds, thereby removing statutory constraints that previously forced rushed decision-making [30][7]. This provides breathing room for cooperative housing developments, which typically require more extended planning periods to organize membership, develop governance structures, and coordinate participatory design processes [14][36].

Community Development Block Grant Program: New Construction Eligibility

Section 202: Expanding CDBG for Housing Development

Section 202 makes a crucial change to CDBG program rules by adding new construction of affordable housing as an explicitly eligible use [30][7][6][19]. Previously, CDBG funds could generally not be used for new residential construction except in limited circumstances (e.g., projects developed by Community-Based Development Organizations that required special certification)[42][43][44].

This restriction forced local governments to use CDBG primarily for the rehabilitation of existing housing or for economic development projects, even when their greatest need was for a new supply of affordable housing [37][42][45]. The legislation removes this artificial constraint, allowing communities to direct CDBG resources toward the construction of new homes [30][6].

Strategic Implications for Rapid River Township

While Rapid River Township does not receive direct CDBG allocations (those flow through Kalkaska County and MSHDA for non-entitlement areas), this provision creates new opportunities[27][28][29]:

1. County-Township Partnerships: Kalkaska County receives Michigan's state-administered CDBG program funds and could designate Rapid River Township as a recipient for a housing project serving low-to-moderate income residents[27][28]. The Eco Village Co-op, as a nonprofit cooperative focused on workforce housing affordability, would align with CDBG income-targeting requirements (serving households at or below 80% AMI)[42][46].

2. Zoning Reform Incentives: Section 202 requires CDBG grantees to submit non-binding reports of adopted or planned zoning regulations that promote housing growth[30][19]. This creates institutional pressure on counties to demonstrate progress in zoning modernization—precisely what the Eco Village Co-op needs. Counties seeking to maintain CDBG eligibility will have an incentive to collaborate with townships to update zoning codes to permit missing-middle housing.

3. Public Land Database: The legislation requires CDBG grantees to maintain publicly accessible databases of undeveloped jurisdiction-owned land[30][7][19]. For land-constrained cooperative housing projects, this transparency could reveal potential sites for acquisition or for partnerships with local government to establish land-banking arrangements.

CDBG's flexibility makes it particularly valuable for cooperative housing, as funds can cover soft costs (planning, legal, and organizational development) that other programs exclude, as well as hard costs for construction and infrastructure [37][38].

Rural Housing Service Improvements: Addressing Rural Barriers

Section 204: Streamlined USDA Rural Housing Programs

Section 204 expands access to USDA Rural Housing Service programs, particularly the Section 504 Home Repair Program, and mandates shortened application processing times (maximum 90 days for Section 502 and 504 programs)[30][7][19]. For a rural Michigan cooperative like Eco Village Co-op, USDA programs represent critical yet historically underutilized resources [47][48].

Northern Michigan townships, such as Rapid River, qualify for USDA Rural Housing Programs based on population density and geographic criteria [47][49]. However, Byzantine application processes and delays—often 6-12 months—have prevented many rural projects from accessing these funds [19]. The legislation's 90-day processing mandate would dramatically improve program accessibility.

USDA recognizes cooperative housing as an eligible structure under its programs, including:

· Section 502 Direct Loans for homeownership (which could apply to cooperative member equity purchases)

· Section 523 Technical Assistance for cooperatives

· Section 538 Guaranteed Rural Rental Housing Loans

Historical precedent includes numerous USDA-financed cooperative housing developments in rural areas, particularly limited-equity cooperatives serving farmworkers and low-income rural residents[47][48]. The legislation's emphasis on expanding participation and modernizing technology could make these programs viable for the Eco Village Co-op's development model.

Regional Planning Grants and Pattern Book Implementation

Section 203: Regional Housing Planning Support

Section 203 authorizes HUD to issue competitive grants to state, local, and tribal governments for regional housing planning and community development activities[7][19]. This provision could support multi-jurisdictional approaches in Kalkaska County and surrounding areas—potentially through Housing North, the regional housing planning organization serving the 10-county area that includes Kalkaska[16][50].

Housing North already facilitates housing policy reform across northern Michigan, working with townships to adopt zoning best practices, implement accessory dwelling unit ordinances, and conduct housing needs assessments[16][50]. Federal grant funding under Section 203 would amplify these efforts, potentially supporting:

· Regional housing needs studies that quantify demand for missing middle housing

· Multi-township zoning reform initiatives that create consistency across jurisdictional boundaries

· Technical assistance programs helping townships like Rapid River navigate complex federal and state housing programs

· Pattern book adoption and customization for northern Michigan's architectural context

The Eco Village Co-op could benefit indirectly, as Housing North and similar organizations use federal grants to build local government capacity and political will for housing innovation [16][50].

Michigan Policy Alignment: Multiplying Impact

The Housing for the 21st Century Act's benefits for Eco Village Co-op are magnified by parallel state-level initiatives creating a uniquely supportive policy environment in Michigan.

Michigan Senate Bill 23: Land Division Reform

Michigan Senate Bill 23, effective July 1, 2026, increases the number of parcels that can be split from a single tract from four to ten[51]. This reform provides critical flexibility for the Eco Village Co-op's development strategy, allowing the cooperative to:

· Subdivide larger parcels to create appropriately-sized lots for fourplex buildings

· Phase development incrementally as membership and financing allow

· Retain common land for shared facilities while creating individual building parcels

· Potentially sell or lease parcels to individual member households organized as mini-cooperatives

The timing—with both federal and state reforms taking effect in 2026—creates a strategic implementation window for advancing the Eco Village Co-op project[51].

MI Home Program: State Incentives for Zoning Reform

Michigan's proposed MI Home Program (pending an $800 million appropriation) would provide grants and revolving loans to communities that adopt at least 50% of recommended housing policy reforms [33][52][16]. These reforms include:

· Allowing duplexes and triplexes in residential areas by-right

· Permitting accessory dwelling units citywide

· Reducing minimum lot sizes

· Eliminating or reducing parking minimums

· Allowing higher density near transit and commercial corridors

Communities designated as "housing ready" through the adoption of these reforms become eligible for state funding that developers can use for construction [33][52][53]. For Eco Village Co-op, this creates a powerful argument to present to Rapid River Township: adopting zoning reforms to accommodate the cooperative's fourplex model would qualify the township for MI Home designation, making it eligible for state housing investment that benefits the entire community, not just the Eco Village Co-op[33][52].

The MI Home Program's "carrot not stick" approach—incentivizing rather than mandating zoning reform—mirrors the Housing for the 21st Century Act's voluntary guidelines framework[33][52]. This consistency between federal and state policy creates reinforcing momentum for local reform.

Michigan Pattern Book Homes: Ready-Made Designs

Michigan's existing Pattern Book Homes initiative, developed by the Michigan Municipal League and MEDC, already provides free construction plans for duplexes and fourplexes designed for Michigan's climate and architectural traditions [22] [23][24]. Volume I and Volume II of the Pattern Book offer multiple design options with:

· Classic architectural styles compatible with existing neighborhoods

· Separate HVAC systems and sound buffering between units

· Options for universal design and barrier-free ground floor units

· Estimated construction costs ($500K duplex, $900K fourplex)

· Guidance for communities on zoning code updates

The Eco Village Co-op could directly adopt these plans or adapt them to incorporate cohousing features, thereby significantly reducing architectural costs [22][23][24]. Federal pattern book grants authorized by the Housing for the 21st Century Act could fund the adaptation of Michigan's plans specifically for cooperative housing applications, thereby creating a replicable model for rural cooperatives statewide [19][20].

Michigan's aggressive embrace of housing reform—including a 2024 law requiring all municipalities to include housing as a core element in master plans—creates political and regulatory tailwinds for innovative projects like Eco Village Co-op[16].

Financial Impact Analysis

The combined federal and state policy reforms create multiple pathways for the Eco Village Co-op to reduce development costs and accelerate construction timelines:

Direct Cost Reductions:

· Pre-approved pattern book designs: $10,000+ per unit savings ($40,000+ per fourplex) from reduced architectural fees and faster approvals[21]

· Streamlined environmental review: $15,000-$50,000 savings from NEPA exemptions for infill projects[39]

· Infrastructure funding through HOME: Potentially $100,000-$500,000 for roads, utilities, and site improvements that would otherwise require private financing[30][19]

· CDBG construction grants: Up to $1 million+ for qualifying affordable housing new construction (must meet low-moderate income requirements)[30][42][19]

Timeline Acceleration:

· Pattern book expedited permitting: 1-4 month reduction in approval timelines[21][22]

· NEPA exemptions: 6-18 month reduction in environmental review[39]

· USDA 90-day processing mandate: 3-9 month reduction in rural housing program approvals[19]

· Combined effect: Potentially 12-24 months acceleration of the overall development schedule, reducing carrying costs and interest during construction

Leverage and Financing Access:

· HOME program workforce housing eligibility: Access to below-market financing for member households earning 80-120% AMI[30][32][31]

· USDA cooperative housing programs: Section 502 direct loans and Section 523 technical assistance for cooperative organizations [47][48]

· Federal pattern book grants: Potential $50,000-$200,000 for design development and pre-approval processes[19][20]

Conservative estimates suggest the legislation could reduce total development costs by 10-15% through direct cost savings and avoided delays, while expanding financing sources that make the project feasible for working-class households rather than requiring affluent households to self-finance [21][19].

Implementation Roadmap for Eco Village Co-op

To maximize benefits from the Housing for the 21st Century Act, the Eco Village Co-op should pursue a strategic implementation sequence:

Immediate Actions (January-June 2026)

1. Establish Nonprofit Status and Federal Eligibility.

Ensure the Eco Village Co-op is properly structured as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit housing organization or limited-equity housing cooperative with clear eligibility for federal programs[35][36]. This may require working with cooperative development attorneys to ensure that organizational documents comply with HUD and USDA definitions.

2. Build Partnership Network:

Formalize partnerships with:

· Rapid River Township Planning and Zoning Commission (primary zoning authority)

· Kalkaska County Planning Department (administering entity for state CDBG)

· Michigan State Housing Development Authority (HOME program administrator for non-entitlement areas)[27][28][29]

· Housing North (regional housing planning organization)[16][50]

· Northwest Michigan Community Action Agency (which serves Kalkaska County)[49]

These partnerships position Eco Village Co-op as an implementing partner for federal and state grant applications that must be reviewed by government agencies [25][26][46].

3. Engage with Pattern Book Programs.

Connect with Michigan Municipal League's Pattern Book Homes team to:

· Review existing fourplex designs for suitability to the cohousing model

· Identify customization needs (shared facilities, community spaces, sustainable systems)

· Position for federal pattern book grant applications when Section 102 funding becomes available[23][24][22]

4. Advance Zoning Reform Proposal Present to Rapid River Township a comprehensive zoning reform proposal that:

· Incorporates HUD best practice guidelines (once published under Section 101) for missing middle housing[7][8]

· References Michigan Pattern Book dimensional standards and design guidelines[23][22]

· Proposes Planned Unit Development overlay or Rural Residential zoning amendment allowing fourplexes[14][15]

· Emphasizes alignment with MI Home Program requirements to qualify township for state housing funding[33][52]

· Uses federal legislation as political legitimacy ("aligning with federal housing priorities")

Medium-Term Actions (Summer-Fall 2026)

5. HOME Program Application Development

Work with MSHDA to prepare HOME Investment Partnerships Program application, including:

· Project budget showing workforce housing income targeting (80-120% AMI)[30][31]

· Infrastructure needs assessment for roads, utilities, and site improvements

· Environmental review documentation (streamlined under NEPA exemptions)[7][40]

· Cooperative governance structure and affordability assurances[34]

6. USDA Rural Housing Coordination

Engage the USDA Rural Development office serving Kalkaska County to:

· Determine eligibility for Section 502, 523, and 538 programs[47][48]

· Prepare applications under new 90-day processing standards[19]

· Explore technical assistance grants for cooperative development

7. Regional Planning Grant Participation

Partner with Housing North or Kalkaska County on Section 203 regional planning grant applications to:

· Fund a comprehensive housing needs assessment for northern Michigan cooperatives

· Develop a replicable cooperative housing toolkit for rural townships

· Support multi-jurisdictional zoning reform efforts[7][16][19]

Long-Term Positioning (2027 and Beyond)

8. CDBG New Construction Application

Once zoning approvals are secured, work with Kalkaska County to apply for Michigan CDBG housing funds under new construction eligibility:

· Target low-moderate income member households (≤80% AMI) for qualifying units[42][46]

· Demonstrate alignment with county Consolidated Plan housing priorities[25][26]

· Leverage HOME and USDA commitments as match and project viability evidence

9. Pattern Book Replication and Technical Assistance

Position Eco Village Co-op as a model project for:

· Federal technical assistance and case study documentation

· Michigan statewide replication through Housing North and regional planning agencies

· Potential federal pattern book grant recipient for rural cooperative housing designs[16][50][19]

Systemic Benefits Beyond Direct Funding

Beyond direct financial assistance, the Housing for the 21st Century Act provides systemic benefits that reduce regulatory barriers and political resistance:

Federal Policy Legitimacy: Local officials facing opposition to fourplex development can cite federal legislation that designates missing-middle housing a national priority and aligns with best practices [4][7]. This shifts political dynamics from "controversial experiment" to "implementing federal guidelines."

Technical Assistance and Capacity Building: HUD resources, model ordinances, and guidebooks reduce the staff time required for planning departments in small townships with limited capacity [54][13]. Rapid River Township, likely without a dedicated planning staff, can utilize federal templates rather than hiring expensive consultants.

Market Transformation: Federal recognition of missing middle housing helps normalize fourplexes and cooperative housing in financing markets. Lenders, appraisers, and insurers—often hesitant about unfamiliar housing types—gain confidence when federal agencies endorse and fund these models[35][36].

Political Air Cover: Elected officials in rural townships often personally support housing innovation but fear political backlash from constituents opposed to "density" or "affordable housing"[16]. Federal legislation and voluntary guidelines provide cover: "We're simply aligning our codes with federal best practices, which makes us eligible for housing funding."

Peer Learning Networks: As more communities adopt pattern books and zoning reforms, peer-to-peer learning accelerates the diffusion of these practices. Rapid River Township officials can visit nearby communities that have successfully implemented similar changes, thereby reducing perceived risk [16][21].

Potential Challenges and Risk Mitigation

While the Housing for the 21st Century Act creates substantial opportunities, several implementation challenges deserve attention:

Legislative Timeline Uncertainty: The bill must still pass the full House, reconcile with the Senate's ROAD to Housing Act, and receive a presidential signature. While prospects appear strong given bipartisan support, political dynamics could delay enactment until late 2026 or beyond[1][2]. Mitigation: Proceed with state-level initiatives (Michigan SB 23, MI Home Program, Pattern Book Homes) that provide many similar benefits regardless of federal action.

Competitive Grant Processes: Pattern book grants (Section 102) and regional planning grants (Section 203) will be awarded competitively rather than through formula-based entitlements [7][19]. The Eco Village Co-op must submit high-quality applications and may face rejection. Mitigation: Partner with experienced grant writers, leverage Housing North's technical expertise, and prepare multiple application strategies targeting different funding streams.

HOME Program Administration Complexity: HOME has notoriously complex compliance requirements, including environmental review, procurement standards, labor standards, and affordability restrictions[31][38]. Small cooperatives may lack the capacity to navigate these requirements. Mitigation: Work through MSHDA as the administrator and consider hiring HOME-experienced consultants or partnering with Community Development Financial Institutions that specialize in cooperative housing [35][26].

Local Political Resistance: Despite federal and state policy support, local zoning reform may still face opposition from residents concerned about neighborhood change, increased traffic, or impacts on property values [16][17]. Mitigation: Conduct extensive community engagement emphasizing design quality, compatibility with existing neighborhoods (using Pattern Book designs), and broader community benefits like qualifying the township for housing funding.

Rural Infrastructure Constraints: Kalkaska County's rural infrastructure (roads, water, sewer) may lack capacity to accommodate increased density without substantial investment [49][55]. Mitigation: Prioritize HOME infrastructure funding, explore on-site solutions (e.g., wells and septic systems), and phase development to match infrastructure capacity.

Comparative Advantage and Strategic Positioning

The Eco Village Co-op enters a uniquely favorable moment in housing policy history, with federal, state, and local forces converging:

Federal Level: The Housing for the 21st Century Act establishes missing-middle housing and cooperative models as national priorities, with dedicated funding streams [1][2][7].

State Level: Michigan leads the nation in aggressive housing policy reform, with Pattern Book Homes providing free designs, the MI Home Program incentivizing local zoning reform, and SB 23 enabling flexible land division [51][23][33][16].

Regional Level: Housing North and northern Michigan planning organizations have built capacity and political coalitions for housing reform, thereby creating peer pressure and technical support [16][50].

Local Level: Rural townships increasingly recognize that housing shortages threaten economic viability, creating openness to solutions that were politically infeasible five years ago [16][49].

This policy alignment is historically unusual—typically, federal, state, and local governments work at cross-purposes on housing. The current alignment creates a 2-3-year window of opportunity before political dynamics may shift.

The Eco Village Co-op's fourplex cohousing model exemplifies precisely what policymakers seek: missing middle housing that increases density moderately (from single-family to four units) while maintaining neighborhood character; cooperative ownership that ensures long-term affordability; and sustainable design that reduces environmental impact. Projects that embody these characteristics are ideally positioned to receive federal and state support.

Conclusion: From Regulatory Obstacle to Policy Priority

The Housing for the 21st Century Act fundamentally transforms the regulatory and financial landscape for the Eco Village Co-op. What was previously a project swimming against the current of federal housing policy—navigating programs designed for either single-family homeownership or large-scale multifamily rental development—becomes a project aligned with explicit federal priorities for missing middle housing, cooperative ownership, and rural community development.

The legislation's voluntary guidelines for zoning reform (Section 101) confer federal endorsement on Rapid River Township and provide technical templates for approving fourplex cohousing. Pattern book grants (Section 102) provide funding to develop and pre-approve cooperative housing designs, thereby reducing architectural costs and shortening permitting timelines. HOME program reforms (Section 201) expand eligibility to workforce-income households and provide funding for infrastructure, thereby directly addressing the Eco Village Co-op's financing and site development needs. CDBG new-construction eligibility (Section 202) creates additional funding pathways in Kalkaska County. The USDA Rural Housing Streamlining (Section 204) streamlines federal rural programs by establishing 90-day processing commitments.

When combined with Michigan's parallel initiatives—Senate Bill 23's land division flexibility, the MI Home Program's zoning reform incentives, and Pattern Book Homes' free designs—the Eco Village Co-op operates in an unprecedented policy environment that supports innovation in cooperative housing. Conservative estimates suggest 10-15% cost reductions through expedited approvals, infrastructure funding, and design efficiencies, while accelerating timelines by 12-24 months reduces carrying costs and interest during construction.

Perhaps most importantly, the legislation provides political legitimacy and technical capacity to local officials seeking to approve innovative housing, but who need federal backing to overcome local resistance. By framing the Eco Village Co-op as implementing federal best practices and qualifying Rapid River Township for housing funding, the project transforms from a controversial density increase to a strategic alignment with national priorities.

The Eco Village Co-op should move rapidly to capitalize on this window of opportunity: establishing nonprofit eligibility, building government partnerships, engaging with pattern book programs, advancing zoning reforms, and preparing federal grant applications. Projects that position themselves early in new policy regimes—demonstrating proof of concept and building political relationships—often secure disproportionate support as agencies seek success stories to validate new programs.

The Housing for the 21st Century Act does not guarantee the Eco Village Co-op's success. Still, it removes barriers that previously made cooperative fourplex development nearly impossible in rural Michigan townships. What was an uphill regulatory battle becomes a project aligned with the trajectory of federal housing policy. This fundamental shift dramatically improves prospects for creating the affordable, sustainable, community-oriented housing the cooperative envisions.

⁂

1. https://www.nar.realtor/magazine/real-estate-news/bipartisan-housing-for-the-21st-century-act-advances-in-house-committee-markup

2. https://nlihc.org/resource/house-committee-financial-services-passes-bipartisan-housing-21st-century-act

3. https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=410959

4. https://eig.org/the-era-of-federal-zoning-reform-has-arrived/

5. https://www.usmayors.org/2025/12/19/mayors-applaud-passage-of-housing-for-the-21st-century-act-in-house-committee/

6. https://www.usmayors.org/2025/12/16/u-s-conference-of-mayors-applauds-introduction-of-the-housing-for-the-21st-century-act/

7. https://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/2025-12-11_-sbs-_housing_for_the_21st_century_act_final.pdf

8. https://financialservices.house.gov/UploadedFiles/2025-12-29_-SBS-_Housing_for_the_21st_Century_Act_ReportedFINAL.pdf

9. https://montgomeryplanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/MissingMiddleHousingStudy_9-2018.pdf

10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_middle_housing

11. https://architectureau.com/articles/what-is-pattern-book-development-and-how-can-it-help-ease-the-housing-crisis/

12. https://upforgrowth.org/news_insights/the-role-of-middle-housing-in-tackling-americas-housing-challenge/

13. https://birchwood.law/federal-pro-housing-land-use-and-zoning-reforms/

14. https://www.perplexity.ai/search/ac568227-2c6c-41a8-848c-4bdbfc241232

15. https://www.perplexity.ai/search/72714d11-f928-4898-bf87-b1b95534b4e9

16. https://fromcommonground.com/michigan-communities-tackle-housing-crisis-with-zoning-reform-and-collaboration/

17. https://www.rpoaonline.org/news/709009/800M-Housing-Proposal-Tied-to-Local-Zoning-Reform-Gains-Bipartisan-Interest.htm

18. https://www.cnu.org/sites/default/files/Enabling_Better_Places_Jan_2018.pdf

19. https://www.naco.org/news/house-introduces-bipartisan-housing-package

20. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/whats-in-the-housing-for-the-21st-century-act/

21. https://better-cities.org/community-growth-housing/cities-can-fast-track-infill-housing-with-pre-approved-plans-and-they-should/

22. https://mml.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/MML-Pattern-Book-Homes-9-8-22-final.pdf

23. https://www.michiganbusiness.org/press-releases/2022/09/mml-and-medc-bring-more-housing-options-to-michigan-communities-faster/

24. https://mml.org/resources-research/books-and-briefs/pattern-book-homes-for-21st-century-michigan/volume-ii-the-missing-middle-mixtape/

25. https://nhc.org/policy-guide/federal-rental-and-homeownership-programs/federal-housing-block-grant-programs/

26. https://www.localhousingsolutions.org/fund/federal-programs-for-affordable-housing/

27. https://www.michigan.gov/mshda/neighborhoods/community-development-block-grant

28. https://cuppad.org/cdbg-projects/

29. https://www.miplace.org/programs/community-development-block-grant/

30. interests.housing.cooperative_housing

31. https://www.naco.org/news/house-financial-services-committee-passes-housing-21st-century-act

32. https://www.hudexchange.info/news/hud-publishes-home-final-rule/

33. https://leadingage.org/house-moves-forward-on-affordable-housing-reforms/

34. https://www.thepernateam.com/blog/michigan-cities-push-for-800m-housing-incentives-to-address-affordable-housing-crisis/

35. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-24/subtitle-A/part-92

36. https://ncbaclusa.coop/content/uploads/2024/09/HUD-Section-213-Co-op-Housing-Program-Overview_FINAL.pdf

37. https://impact.ncb.coop/hubfs/assets/resources/Co-op-Housing-Development-Guide.pdf

38. https://www.ehousingplus.com/how-community-development-block-grants-cdbg-support-affordable-housing-initiatives/

39. https://files.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/HOME-CDBG_Slides.pdf

40. https://publicenterprise.org/report/infill-nation/

41. https://www.michigan.gov/mshda/-/media/Project/Websites/mshda/developers/Environmental/NEPA-Environmental-Review-Fact-Sheet.pdf?rev=c3b3fe9edf0f47e78f85d3f999c2ba92&hash=D67E2EBD6885598A39DF3D45DBE90574

42. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/article/six-deregulatory-proposals-to-improve-housing-affordability/

43. interests.cooperative_housing

44. https://www.hud.gov/hud-partners/community-cdbg

45. https://files.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/Basically-CDBG-Chapter-4-Housing.pdf

46. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/oup/files/cdbgguide.pdf

47. https://coscda.org/advocacy/cdbg-impact/

48. https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/cdbg-entitlement/cdbg-entitlement-program-eligibility-requirements/

49. https://www.rd.usda.gov/files/sr45.pdf

50. https://micondolaw.com/michigan-community-association-law-hoas-co-ops-summer-resorts/co-ops-michigan-state-housing-development-authority-act-of-1966/

51. https://nmcaa.net/kalkaska-county/

52. https://www.housingnorth.org/new-housing-ready-program

53. https://www.perplexity.ai/search/a1d0e5f3-1747-44d3-963c-69b313e861c6

54. https://www.thepernateam.com/blog/michigan-cities-push-for-800m-housing-incentives-to-address-affordable-housing-crisis.html

55. https://www.michigan.gov/mshda/neighborhoods/housing-ready

56. https://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/knowledge-hub/news/the-tale-of-two-housing-bills-house-financial-services-introduces-new-comprehensive-housing-package-following-the-senates-passage-of-housing-bill-earlier-this-year/

57. https://www.housingfinance.com/policy-legislation/housing-21st-century-act-moves-forward

58. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/1701x

59. https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr6644/BILLS-119hr6644ih.pdf

60. https://www.localhousingsolutions.org/policy-insights/social-housing-and-public-developer-models-in-the-us-and-beyond/

61. https://www.rivercare.org/project/rapid-river/restoring-the-wild-flow-of-the-rapid-river/

62. https://www.affordablehousing.com/housing-authority-mi/rapid-river-housing-commission-2252/

63. https://www.grants.gov/learn-grants/grant-making-agencies/u-s-department-of-housing-and-urban-development-hud

64. https://rapidrivertownship.org

65. http://www.hud.gov/hud-partners/grants

66. https://www.oakgov.com/community/neighborhood-housing-development/housing-programs/community-development-block-grants-cdbg

67. https://rapidrivertownship.org/?page_id=45

68. https://entp.hud.gov/idapp/html/f17npdata.cfm

69. https://www.michiganbusiness.org/globalassets/documents/reports/fact-sheets/cdbg.pdf

70. https://www.facebook.com/100064555035378/mentions/

71. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-24/subtitle-B/chapter-VIII/part-850

72. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-24/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-570

73. https://www.housingaffordabilityinstitute.org/policy-center/single-stair-dwellings/

74. https://blogs.duanemorris.com/newmarketslaw/2024/05/08/virginia-passes-bill-to-evaluate-single-stair-point-access-block-for-multifamily-dwellings/

75. https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/Main/documents/HUDPrograms2025.pdf

76. https://www.planning.org/planning/2025/nov/how-a-single-stairway-can-take-affordable-housing-to-a-new-level/

77. https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/cdbg-state/state-cdbg-program-eligibility-requirements/

78. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/cityscape/vol26num1/ch25.pdf

79. https://www.peters.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/federal_grants_guide_for_michigan_municipalities.pdf

80. https://www.niskanencenter.org/understanding-single-stair-reform-efforts-across-the-united-states/

81. https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/SPM/documents/ELIG-REQS-GRANTS-2018v2.pdf

82. https://www.nahb.org/blog/2025/12/house-panel-approves-housing-package

83. https://www.kalkaskalibrary.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/draft_kalkaska_county_recreation_plan1.pdf

84. https://www.huduser.gov/publications/pdf/zoning_multifmlydev.pdf

85. https://nationalhousingcrisis.org/toolkit/regulation-policy/land-use-permitting-building-code-reform-a-path-forward/

86. https://www.uschamber.com/housing/support-for-the-housing-for-the-21st-century-act

87. https://www.nahb.org/blog/2024/11/zoning-regulation-and-affordable-housing

88. https://www.ncsha.org/ncsha-news/ncsha-endorses-housing-for-the-21st-century-act/

89. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/6644/text

90. https://nlihc.org/resource/house-committee-financial-service-releases-bipartisan-housing-21st-century-act-ahead

91. https://www.networkforphl.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Zoning-Reform.pdf

92. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/6644

93. https://www.miplace.org/4a72c5/globalassets/documents/rrc/rrc-library/mml-pattern-book_this-used-to-be-normal.pdf

94. https://www.capecodcommission.org/resource-library/file/?url=%2Fdept%2Fcommission%2Fteam%2FWebsite_Resources%2Fhousing%2FFactSheets%2FRHSFactSheet-PatternBooksDesignGuidelines.pdf

95. https://www.planning.org/pas/reports/report112/

96. https://missingmiddlehousing.com/types/fourplex/

97. https://www.miplace.org/programs/permit-ready-housing-plans/

98. https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/Housing_Planning and Zoning_v8_final.pdf

99. https://mml.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/MML.PatternBookHome.Volume2-11.13.23.pdf

100. https://mml.org/resources-research/books-and-briefs/pattern-book-homes-for-21st-century-michigan/

101. https://www.nahb.org/advocacy/industry-issues/land-use-101/tools-and-research/tools-pages/policy-practical-and-legal-challenges-to-inclusionary-zoning

102. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-08-26/duplex-triplex-construction-nears-record-lows-despite-us-housing-crisis

103. https://fliphtml5.com/narml/xvkj/Pre-Approved_Housing_Designs_for_Infill_Development/

104. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/documents/essential_smart_growth_fixes_rural_0.pdf

105. https://www.cnu.org/publicsquare/2020/08/12/missing-middle-key-housing-america

106. https://www.reddit.com/r/australia/comments/1m1s762/nsw_housing_pattern_book_with_8_options_made/

107. https://www.naco.org/resources/restore-funding-huds-home-investment-partnerships-home-program-3

108. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/948

109. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/06/2024-29824/home-investment-partnerships-program-program-updates-and-streamlining

110. https://mml.org/advocacy/mi-home-program/

111. https://lenaweeseniors.org/DocumentCenter/View/12029

112. https://nlihc.org/resource/house-financial-services-subcommittee-holds-hearing-titled-home-20-modern-solutions

113. https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/cdbg/

114. https://www.michigan.gov/mshda

115. https://www.michigan.gov/mshda/developers/missing-middle

116. https://www.redfin.com/county/1387/MI/Kalkaska-County/new-homes

117. https://www.miplace.org/4a72d4/globalassets/documents/rrc/rrc-library/map-tear-sheets/quick-sheet---missing-middle-housing-solutions.pdf

118. https://planningmi.org/aws/MAP/pt/sd/calendar/364046/_PARENT/layout_details/false

119. https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-search/Kalkaska-County_MI/shw-nc

120. https://data.detroitmi.gov/datasets/detroitmi::one-billion-dollar-affordable-multifamily-housing-construction-sites/about

121. https://missingmiddlehousing.com

122. https://www.zillow.com/kalkaska-county-mi/new-homes/

123. https://groundworkcenter.org/missing-middle-housing-not-too-big-not-too-little-just-right/

124. https://www.housingfinance.com/policy-legislation/lawmakers-unveil-ambitious-federal-housing-development-bill_o

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/2651/text